| Unlovable Linux? |
Feb. 02, 2007
At the time, most of us thought Oracle undercutting Red Hat's Linux business with its Unbreakable Linux was a big deal. Would customers flock to Oracle's cut-rate version of RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux)? Would Red Hat be pounded by Larry Ellison's minions?
After a few months, the answers appear to be: No, it wasn't a big deal; and no; and no.
I was reminded of Oracle's move into Linux this week when I started getting calls from financial analysis firms. They wanted to know if I, as someone who follows Linux closely, had heard of any company actually using or trying out Oracle's Unbreakable Linux in a pilot program. My answer? No. I didn't know of a single company that was even testing Unbreakable Linux seriously, much less deploying it in a trial program.
It turns out that the analysts who called me didn't know of any businesses taking Unbreakable Linux seriously, either. So, we agreed to check into it further and compare notes if we found anyone.
We didn't find anyone.
Maybe this isn't too surprising. Both before, and after, Oracle's move into Linux, I said Oracle getting into the Linux distribution business was dumb. It turns out a lot of people seem to agree with me.
Take, for example, this comment from Oracle's second-quarter earnings call on Nov. 30, 2006: "In the first 30 days, we had 9,000 downloads of Unbreakable Linux from our website and hundreds of customers connecting their servers to our network," said Charles E. Phillips, co-president of Oracle.
9,000 downloads in the first 30 days? That's nothing.
Red Hat's community-based Linux, Fedora Core 6, has averaged almost 100,000 downloads a week since its release on Oct. 24. By early January, Fedora had cracked the million download mark. Other open-source operating systems that have already been downloaded more than a million times, include Ubuntu, openSUSE, and OpenSolaris. Unbreakable Linux? It's not even a blip on the radar.
It's not that Oracle customers don't like Linux. They do. CRN writers Stacy Cowley and Barbara Darrow recently reported that Mick Gallagher, CEO of LS Technologies, an Oracle partner, said, "More and more [Oracle] customers just assume they'll run on Linux."
Oracle is also continuing to move its applications to Linux. On Jan. 31, Oracle announced major new versions across its software line: Oracle E-Business Suite 12, PeopleSoft Enterprise 9, Siebel CRM 8, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne 8.12, and JD Edwards World A9.1. In the process, Oracle also announced that, for the first time, Siebel CRM, now runs on Linux, specifically Unbreakable Linux. In case you've forgotten, however, Unbreakable Linux is just RHEL without the Red Hat logo.
On Jan. 22, the database giant Oracle got around to releasing a management system for its Linux: Oracle Management Pack for Linux. Based on Oracle's management solution, Oracle Enterprise Manager 10g, it's meant to give Unbreakable Linux support program customers comprehensive Linux server lifecycle management, while helping to reduce the complexity and cost of managing their Linux environments. In short, it's a functional clone of Red Hat's RHN (Red Hat Network).
Oracle's VP of Linux engineering, Wim Coekaerts, proclaimed that "The Oracle Unbreakable Linux support program now features the industry's most comprehensive Linux management solution, at no additional cost to users. Drawing upon our wealth of application and systems management expertise, we offer our customers a single, integrated solution that is unmatched by other Linux support providers."
Oracle has also managed recently to partner up with IBM to bring its Unbreakable Linux to Big Blue's z9 series mainframes. Oddly enough, though, the Management Pack didn't make it over.
So, why isn't Unbreakable Linux taking off? It certainly sounds like Oracle is doing everything it can.
I think Unbreakable Linux hasn't really left the starting gate for the same reasons I always thought Oracle getting into the operating system business was a lousy idea. First, people see Oracle as a database and an applications company. They don't see it as an operating system company.
Next, Oracle continues to have a mediocre reputation with CIOs when it comes to delivering the goods. In the most recent CIO Insight Vendor Value Survey, conducted in late 2006 Oracle came in at number 30. And how did Oracle's competitors do compared to the other operating system companies in this enterprise IT vendors contest? Red Hat was number 3; Sun was in 21st place, followed closely by Novell, 23rd and Microsoft, 24rd.
I find it more than a little telling that the company that Oracle was most directly attacking with its Linux move, Red Hat, ranks so much higher in the minds of the people who decide on what's the best operating system for their enterprises.
All the operating system companies are also, to one extent or another, partners with Oracle. Exactly how much support do you think Sun is going to give Oracle's Unbreakable Linux? Even IBM is giving Unbreakable Linux lukewarm support. Yes, IBM is supporting it on its z9 line, but isn't it interesting that IBM isn't supporting the management tools? What good exactly is any mainframe operating system without management tools? We're not talking Windows Media Center in the living room here!
No. Larry Ellison may be the most stubborn man in IT, but I really don't see his Unbreakable Linux breaking into the business market. For Linux, and for operating systems in general, Oracle is the wrong company at the wrong time.
-- Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
Do you have comments on this story?
Talkback here
NOTE: Please post your comments regarding our articles using the above link. Be sure to use this article's title as the "Subject" in your posts. Before you create a new thread, please check to see if a discussion thread is already running on the article you plan to comment on. Thanks!
(Click here for further information)
|
|
|
7 Advantages of D2D Backup
For decades, tape has been the backup medium of choice. But, now, disk-to-disk (D2D) backup is gaining in favor. Learn why you should make the move in this whitepaper.
4 Legal Reasons to Control Internet Access
The Internet is obviously a valuable resource for many organizations. However, many are exposed to legal liability concerns because they fail to control Internet access. Learn if you're safe in this white paper.
Rapidly Resolve J2EE Application Problems
Whether you are in the process of building J2EE applications or have J2EE applications already running in production, you must ensure that they deliver the expected ROI. Learn how in this white paper.
Load Testing 2.0 for Web 2.0
There are many unknowns in stress testing Web 2.0 applications. Find out how to test the performance of Web 2.0 in this white paper.
Build Better Games Online
For the game infrastructure providers, life is complex. Making money from games has become more complicated. Why? Find out in this white paper.
Building a Virtual Infrastructure from Servers to Storage
This white paper discusses the virtual storage solutions that reduce cost, increase storage utilization, and address the challenges of backing up and restoring Server environments.
Gaining Faster Wireless Connections with WiMAX
Welcome to what is quickly becoming the hyperconnected world where anything that would benefit from being connected to the network will be connected. Learn more in this white paper.
Is Your Desktop a Security Threat?
The new wave of sophisticated crimeware not only targets specific companies, but also targets desktops and laptops as backdoor entryways into those business’ operations and resources. Learn how to stay safe in this white paper.
Increasing SAN Reliability by 100 Percent
Storage area networks (SAN) are a strong part of storage plans. Learn how to increase your reliability and uptime by 100 percent in this case study.
|
|
|
|
|
news feed