| SCO Goes Down in Flames: Novell owns Unix |
Aug. 10, 2007
The day Linux fans have been waiting for since SCO attacked Linux on May 12, 2003 has finally arrived. U.S. District Court Judge Dale Kimball has ruled that Novell, not SCO, owns Unix's IP (intellectual property) rights. This, in turn, means the end of SCO's cases against IBM.
In his 102-page decision, Kimball went on to rule that "SCO is obligated to recognize Novell's waiver of SCO's claims against IBM and Sequent" [story], Thus, not only does Novell own Unix, SCO's cases against IBM have essentially been destroyed.
Putting salt into SCO's wounds, Kimball also ruled that while "The court ... is precluded from granting a constructive trust with respect to the payments SCO received under the 2003 Sun and Microsoft Agreements [story] because there is a question of fact as to the appropriate amount of SVRX Royalties SCO owes to Novell based on the portion of SVRX products contained in each agreement." In short, SCO owes Novell at least some of the funds it received from its Microsoft and Sun Unix licensing deals, which it used to fuel its anti-Linux lawsuits.
In the end, what did SCO in was not its ever more shaky IP claims against Linux, but the contract that gave SCO the right to sell and market Unix, but not its IP rights. Since February of 2004, Novell had been insisting that in the original APA (Asset Purchase Agreement) and Amendment No.2 to the APA, it never sold Unix's IP to SCO.
SCO was never able to mount a convincing case that it, rather than Novell, owned Unix's IP. Minutes from a 1995 meeting of Novell's board of directors clearly state, for example, that Novell was to retain its Unix copyrights when it sold the operating system to Santa Cruz Operation. Caldera subsequently bought Santa Cruz Operation's Unix division and then, in late August, 2002, changed its name to The SCO Group Inc.
Novell has also claimed that in late 2002, SCO CEO Darl McBride had tried to get Novell to amend the APA to give SCO Unix's copyrights. Thus, this proved, according to Novell's lawyers' logic, that SCO already knew that it didn't own Unix's IP.
SCO's counter-arguments amounted to: "Why would we buy an operating system without its copyright?" It's a good question. The answer was that Novell simply never wanted to sell Unix's IP. In addition, Santa Cruz Operation didn't have the funds to buy Unix's IP in 1995, and they were unable to convince Novell to sell them outright in 1996.
So it was that Judge Kimball concluded "that Novell is the owner of the UNIX and UnixWare copyrights." As for the IBM cases, "The only reasonable interpretation of the term 'SVRX License' in the APA is all licenses related to the SVRX products listed in Item VI of Schedule 1.1(a) to the APA. Therefore, Novell is entitled ... at its sole discretion, to direct SCO to waive its claims against IBM and Sequent, and SCO is obligated to recognize Novell's waiver of SCO's claims against IBM and Sequent."
While an appeal is technically possible, it appears that little benefit could come from such an approach. If this decision stands, there's little left but loose threads to any of SCO's Linux cases.
Pamela Jones, editor of Groklaw, the news site that has covered the SCO case like paint, doubtlessly spoke for many Linux users when she told Linux-Watch, "The entire Linux community can now breathe normally again. Me too. And it feels fine."
--Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
Do you have comments on this story?
Talkback here
NOTE: Please post your comments regarding our articles using the above link. Be sure to use this article's title as the "Subject" in your posts. Before you create a new thread, please check to see if a discussion thread is already running on the article you plan to comment on. Thanks!
Related Stories:
(Click here for further information)
|
|
|
7 Advantages of D2D Backup
For decades, tape has been the backup medium of choice. But, now, disk-to-disk (D2D) backup is gaining in favor. Learn why you should make the move in this whitepaper.
4 Legal Reasons to Control Internet Access
The Internet is obviously a valuable resource for many organizations. However, many are exposed to legal liability concerns because they fail to control Internet access. Learn if you're safe in this white paper.
Rapidly Resolve J2EE Application Problems
Whether you are in the process of building J2EE applications or have J2EE applications already running in production, you must ensure that they deliver the expected ROI. Learn how in this white paper.
Load Testing 2.0 for Web 2.0
There are many unknowns in stress testing Web 2.0 applications. Find out how to test the performance of Web 2.0 in this white paper.
Build Better Games Online
For the game infrastructure providers, life is complex. Making money from games has become more complicated. Why? Find out in this white paper.
Building a Virtual Infrastructure from Servers to Storage
This white paper discusses the virtual storage solutions that reduce cost, increase storage utilization, and address the challenges of backing up and restoring Server environments.
Gaining Faster Wireless Connections with WiMAX
Welcome to what is quickly becoming the hyperconnected world where anything that would benefit from being connected to the network will be connected. Learn more in this white paper.
Is Your Desktop a Security Threat?
The new wave of sophisticated crimeware not only targets specific companies, but also targets desktops and laptops as backdoor entryways into those business’ operations and resources. Learn how to stay safe in this white paper.
Increasing SAN Reliability by 100 Percent
Storage area networks (SAN) are a strong part of storage plans. Learn how to increase your reliability and uptime by 100 percent in this case study.
|
|
|
|
|
news feed