| Software Freedom Law Center: Don't trust Microsoft's promises |
Mar. 13, 2008
If you're a Linux or open-source developer, should you trust Microsoft in relation to its recent major announcement about its Open Specification Promise? The knee-jerk Linux user answer is "No!" Now, the SFLC (Software Freedom Law Center) has published a paper that goes into fine legal detail about what Microsoft says it promises and what it actually promises.
The short paper, "Microsoft's Open Specification Promise: No Assurance for GPL," concludes that Microsoft can't be trusted for three main reasons: "Microsoft's ability to revoke the promise for future versions of specifications, the promise's limited scope, and its incompatibility with free software licenses, including the GPL."
Specifically, the SFLC looked at the promise's scope and stated, "Because of this narrow definition of the covered specifications, no future versions of any of the specifications are guaranteed to be covered under the OSP. Each new version is subject to Microsoft's ongoing discretion on a case by case basis. In other words, every time a specification changes, Microsoft can effectively revoke the OSP as it had applied to previous versions of that same specification."
The SFLC also interprets the Microsoft clause that states that "the OSP does not apply to any work that you do beyond the scope of the covered specification(s)" as something of a poison pill. From a legal standpoint, the OSP doesn't cover any code implementing the specification that could be used for some other purpose. In other words, "it permits implementation under free software licenses so long as the resulting code isn't used freely."
In addition, the SFLC said, Microsoft deliberately tries to tar the GPL as a confusing license by saying, "Because the General Public License … is not universally interpreted the same way by everyone, we can't give anyone a legal opinion about how our language relates to the GPL or other OSS licenses, but based on feedback from the open-source community we believe that a broad audience of developers can implement the specification(s)."
The SFLC said, "Microsoft wrongly blames the free software legal community for Microsoft's failure to present a promise that satisfies the requirements of the GPL. It is true that a broad audience of developers could implement the specifications, but they would be unable to be certain that implementations based on the latest versions of the specifications would be safe from attack. They would also be unable to distribute their code for any type of use, as is integral to the GPL and to all free software."
Karen Sandler, SFCL counsel, concluded in a statement, "Based on our review of the OSP, we do not recommend that free software developers rely on it for assurance."
The SFLC also noted, "Microsoft issued the OSP to address the issue of patent liability for implementers of Microsoft's Open Office XML (OOXML) file format." A few days after Microsoft released its Open Specification Promise, the ISO began considering making Open XML an ISO standard.
In addition, as we now know, the European Union was getting ready to slam Microsoft with a record 899 million Euro ($1.35 billion dollar) fine for not being more forthcoming with its proprietary intellectual property.
-- Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
Do you have comments on this story?
Talkback here
NOTE: Please post your comments regarding our articles using the above link. Be sure to use this article's title as the "Subject" in your posts. Before you create a new thread, please check to see if a discussion thread is already running on the article you plan to comment on. Thanks!
(Click here for further information)
|
|
|
7 Advantages of D2D Backup
For decades, tape has been the backup medium of choice. But, now, disk-to-disk (D2D) backup is gaining in favor. Learn why you should make the move in this whitepaper.
4 Legal Reasons to Control Internet Access
The Internet is obviously a valuable resource for many organizations. However, many are exposed to legal liability concerns because they fail to control Internet access. Learn if you're safe in this white paper.
Rapidly Resolve J2EE Application Problems
Whether you are in the process of building J2EE applications or have J2EE applications already running in production, you must ensure that they deliver the expected ROI. Learn how in this white paper.
Load Testing 2.0 for Web 2.0
There are many unknowns in stress testing Web 2.0 applications. Find out how to test the performance of Web 2.0 in this white paper.
Build Better Games Online
For the game infrastructure providers, life is complex. Making money from games has become more complicated. Why? Find out in this white paper.
Building a Virtual Infrastructure from Servers to Storage
This white paper discusses the virtual storage solutions that reduce cost, increase storage utilization, and address the challenges of backing up and restoring Server environments.
Gaining Faster Wireless Connections with WiMAX
Welcome to what is quickly becoming the hyperconnected world where anything that would benefit from being connected to the network will be connected. Learn more in this white paper.
Is Your Desktop a Security Threat?
The new wave of sophisticated crimeware not only targets specific companies, but also targets desktops and laptops as backdoor entryways into those business’ operations and resources. Learn how to stay safe in this white paper.
Increasing SAN Reliability by 100 Percent
Storage area networks (SAN) are a strong part of storage plans. Learn how to increase your reliability and uptime by 100 percent in this case study.
|
|
|
|
|
Use of this site is governed by our Terms of
Service and Privacy Policy.
Except where otherwise specified, the contents of this site are copyright © 1999-2008
Ziff Davis Enterprise Holdings Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Ziff Davis Enterprise is
prohibited. Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.
news feed